Washington, D.C.
-- Defenders of
Wildlife praised Rep. Jim Nussle today for not including drilling revenues from
the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in the House budget bill. The move marks a
reversal from last year, when Nussle left the door open for pro-drilling members
to use the budget reconciliation process to try to open the refuge to oil and
gas drilling. That attempt ultimately failed.
"Jim Nussle has said that a clean budget is
one of his top priorities, and he has proven that today by keeping dicey policy
language that has no budgetary consequence, namely drilling in the Arctic
refuge, out of the budget," stated Rodger Schlickeisen, president of
Defenders of Wildlife.
The budget process last year was marred by the
inclusion of highly controversial legislation that would have opened the Arctic
refuge to oil and gas drilling. Rep. Nussle included reconciliation instructions
to the House Resources and Senate Energy committees, requiring them to produce
budget savings of $2.4 billion, which was the exact amount projected in the
President’s budget for the sale of tracts of the Arctic refuge’s coastal
plain.
House Resources Committee Chairman Richard Pombo
(R-CA) and Senate Energy Committee Chairman Pete Domenici (R-NM) wasted no time
taking advantage of this loophole and tried to use it to circumvent the normal
public discussion and legislative checks and balances. A scheme like this is the
only way drilling proponents see to finally open the refuge since they lack the
support from the American public to introduce it as a stand-alone bill.
As the chairman of the House Budget Committee,
Nussle has the ultimate say as to what is included in the final version of the
House budget.
"His federal budget plan for this year
reflects the views of the American people much more clearly than last year in
that he has left out any language that would open the Arctic National Wildlife
Refuge to drilling," continued Schlickeisen. "Rep. Nussle has learned
from last year’s embarrassing and time-consuming budget reconciliation process
and the Arctic battle that ensued. I hope that his "drill-it-all"
colleagues in Congress will also recognize that drilling in the refuge is a sad,
old idea that will do nothing to break our country’s addiction to foreign
oil."
Senator Judd Gregg (R-NH), chairman of the Senate
Budget Committee, introduced a Senate budget bill that did include the drilling
provision. The differences between the bills will have to be reconciled in a
conference report. Conferencing is a potential brick wall standing in the way of
the Senate’s attempts to use the budget as a vehicle to open the Arctic refuge
to oil drilling. The House has already made its position clear on this
controversial issue by blocking its inclusion in the budget last year, and by
refusing to include oil drilling provisions this year.
"Rep. Nussle was wise to keep this hornet’s
nest out of the budget and point our government down a more productive
path," declared Schlickeisen. "I’m disappointed in the actions of
the Senate, though. That body has just openly declared war on the budget
process, the Arctic refuge, and the hundreds of thousands of polar bears,
caribou and musk oxen, and millions of migratory birds that call this safe haven
home. The House of Representatives and the American people were on the refuge’s
side last year, and they will stand stronger this year to make sure once again
that no drill enters their refuge."